Hoboken Mayor Zimmer introduces ethics reforms -- but said to target a certain councilwoman
Feb 10, 2011 | 2385 views | 5 5 comments | 40 40 recommendations | email to a friend | print

HOBOKEN -- On Thursday afternoon, Mayor Dawn Zimmer, with Councilman Ravinder Bhalla by her side, announced a city ethics reform package which would target, among other issues, the campaign finance issue of "wheeling." The proposal is being put before the City Council in advance of the six May council elections.

Wheeling is a term used to describe the funneling of money through other means (such as political action committees) to candidates exceed personal campaign limits.

Some of the more sweeping proposed changes, which have been controversially attached to a Pay-to-Play ordinance to be presented to the City Council, would include a limit on outside Political Action Committees (PACs) donating to Hoboken and a limit on PACs that are self financed by more than 75 percent from donating more than $500 to Hoboken candidates. Currently, PACs can donate up to $8,200. PACs from Hoboken that are not self financed would still be permitted to donate $8,200.

Councilman Ravinder Bhalla, a sponsor of the legislation, said in an interview earlier this week that the "catalyst" for the legislation was Councilwoman Beth Mason's donations to Councilman Tim Occhipinti before the November election between former Councilman Michael Lenz (a Zimmer supporter) and Occhipinti. Mason donated the maximum limit of $2,600, as did her husband, to Occhipinti's campaign in the November's election. Mason's PAC also donated $8,200, the maximum allowed.

Mason said that what she did was not illegal, something that both sides have agreed is true. However, the new legislation would make her actions unlawful in the future.

Critics of the legislation claim the new legislation may not stand up to a serious legal challenge. Zimmer has said the proposed legislation was approved through the corporation counsel's office and found to be constitutional. Mason has also said she has had lawyers look at the legislation as it is proposed, and she said her attorneys have found it to be unconstitutional.

For more on this story, see this weekend's Hoboken Reporter.

Other issues in the ethics reform package include mandatory ethics and anti-sexual harassment training for all public employees, a ban on workplace violence, a ban on nepotism, and a ban on political fundraising on public property, among other changes. - Ray Smith

Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Hobokeneer
|
February 11, 2011
Everyone knows about the $2,600 limits on contributions to candidates. Beth found a loophole and figured out how to get $40 into the hands of every person in the 4th Ward that Matt Calicchio and Pupie Raia could track down so that they could vote (I mean "work") for Occhipinti.

The Attorney General will have something to say about whether buying 4th Ward votes is legal or not, but there's no reason why Beth's loophole should stay open.

It's unconstitutional to close the loophole that allows one person to contribute more than $10,000??? Ha! Good luck with that.
ReformerusG
|
February 11, 2011
Very likely ELEC violations by Beth Mason with respect to Tim Occhipinti Campaign- Not just wheeling which is legal but suspect!

The story: http://thehobokenjournal.blogspot.com/2011/02/beth-mason-not-just-wheeling-possibly.html

The report: http://issuu.com/HobokenJournal/docs/beth_mason_campaign_contribution_laundering_tim_oc

Hoboken Journal - I report and you decide!

Andynboken
|
February 11, 2011
Just want everyone reading this to put the story in perspective. We are not talking about Beth spending $1mm through a coordinated web of donors but less thank $20k. Is it just me or is this being blown way out of proportion by the mayor and Bhalla. You cannot honestly tell me that this small amount of money made that much of a difference in who voted in the 2nd ward. If Lenz was unable to win, no amount of donations contributed to it so significantly that it warrants this legislation. Next time run a better candidate.

I agree completely about limiting outside PACs from donating thus eliminating the chance for corruption in the form of favorable variances to developers. However, should any outside PAC publicly disclose its donor base on the city website it should be allowed as fair game. The voting public is not as dumb as you would believe.

If the mayor wants to remain an agent of change she needs to get out and meet more of the people and campaign on her results. She's doing a pretty good job so far.

khoboken
|
February 10, 2011
I would like to hear exactly why is is unconstitutional. Bet Mazin saying she has had "her lawyers" look at it means nothing to me. That is like Bernie Madoff saying his lawyers told him his Ponzi scheme was ok. However, I doubt that the Queen of Transparency will ever allow any light to be shed on the topic. Effing hypocrite.
hobokenitis
|
February 10, 2011
this is hilarious. I guess it's OK when the mayor uses her resources to fund other candidates' campaigns but not so cool when she gets outspent. It's obvious that this won't survive a court challenge. Zimmer and the increasingly loopy Ravi Bhala are playing politics, pure and simple.