The questions everyone’s asking
Three mayoral frontrunners respond to rumors, criticism
by Timothy J. Carroll
Reporter staff writer
May 03, 2009 | 1550 views | 8 8 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print

view slideshow (4 images)

Was Dawn Zimmer really planted in the Hoboken mayoral election by a political organization to siphon votes from candidate Beth Mason? Since Mason has simultaneously used three paid public relations people and a paid aide just in her job as a part-time city councilwoman, would she really be able to cut employee spending if she ascended to the mayoralty? Is Councilman Peter Cammarano secretly allied with Mayor David Roberts?

These rumors and criticisms have been swirling around the three front-running Hoboken mayoral candidates for the last few months, and last week, the Reporter asked the questions directly.

Of course, there are bigger issues – taxes, education, government transparency – and the candidates talked about those issues in their mayoral profiles (see other story).

The election for a four-year term as Hoboken’s mayor will be held Tuesday, May 12. Six people are running for the seat. Cammarano, Mason, and Zimmer are the three frontrunners, and are also sitting councilpeople.

The three independents, Ryn Melberg, Frank Orsini, and Tom Vincent, were profiled on the cover of last weekend’s edition.

Questions about Mason

Mason has been on the receiving end of various critical questions both on the internet and in letters in this newspaper for the last six months.

Some residents have charged that Mason is hypocritical for becoming allied with a local political organization in her run for mayor, since she complained last spring that Dawn Zimmer, during a run for council, had accepted funding from the county’s longtime political organization, the Hudson County Democratic Organization. At the time, Mason complained that taking help from a machine could make you beholden to that machine. However, since announcing her run for mayor, Mason has received the support of a powerful countywide politician – Union City Mayor and State Sen. Brian Stack – and members of the powerful Anthony Russo Civic Association in Hoboken, founded by former Mayor Anthony Russo.

Support from the Russo group is often quite helpful when one needs votes in the 3rd Ward on the west side of town.

In response to these questions, Mason said last week that she is glad that fellow Councilman Michael Russo, the son of the former mayor and a member of the organization, is in her corner. She also said she doesn’t connect the dots from Michael to his father, who spent time in prison for accepting bribes during his time in office. And she said Anthony Russo’s connection to the organization isn’t a problem. “When people serve their time and are moving forward, we should support that,” she said.

Many people think that Michael Russo also played a major part in Mason’s selection of her City Council running mates, who are long-time Hobokenites rather than the newcomer base from whom “reform” candidates typically draw. Michael Russo said many times last year that he might run for mayor, but instead dropped out of the race and is now supporting Mason, as is Russo’s cousin, Councilwoman Theresa Castellano.

Mason has said in the past that she had made no deals with Michael Russo, and last week, she said Michael Russo had “no impact whatsoever” on the selection of her council ticket.

She said she has known the three candidates for years, with the exception of Vincent Addeo, whom she just met in the past year. The other two on her slate are finance expert Anthony Pasquale, a former Housing Authority chairman who was appointed to that board by Anthony Russo, and Raul Morales II, a young attorney.

Some observers say that with her choices, she has alienated her base, but Mason said this is a way to allow other factions of Hoboken to have a say.

“When you make decisions – these are tough decisions that the next mayor will have to make,” Mason said. “It means people sometimes don’t agree with you.”

Mason was asked about the fact that last year, she was very critical of politicians holding two or more taxpayer jobs, but now she is working with Stack, who is Union City mayor and a state Senator.

Mason said, “He is one of the few people who is able to do both jobs very well.” But she added that it didn’t excuse the dual position holding. Nonetheless, it wouldn’t stop her from accepting the support of Stack, she said.

In her two years on the council, Mason has operated with several paid consultants – PR, political, legal, and otherwise – as well as a paid staffer. Unlike in Jersey City, Hoboken council people don’t get money to hire aides, so she has used her own money.

Mason said that her use of aides isn’t an indication that she needs a lot of people around to get things done. She said if she’s elected mayor, city positions will be evaluated to find out whether each job is needed.

Recently, Mason was criticized for not getting her campaign funding forms in to the state on time. Her camp promised this newspaper that it would produce receipts to prove that campaign funding forms were sent to the state on time. But after several requests to the campaign and Mason over the past week, they failed to produce any evidence that the state deadline was met.

One more criticism has to do with Mason’s vote to continue a tax abatement for the Church Towers moderate income housing building. Mason held a meeting for residents a few weeks before the vote, even though the complex is in Russo’s ward and not hers. Taxpayers who had been researching the abatement and its ramifications have complained that the meeting was not public and they were kept out, despite Mason’s previous record of fighting for open government.

Questions about Zimmer

Zimmer has come under criticism for making promises to her 4th Ward constituents that she didn’t keep, particularly vowing in the Reporter last year that she wouldn’t run for mayor because she had too many issues to tackle as the new 4th Ward councilwoman. But her vow changed in the last few months of last year.

Zimmer said last week that her vow to not run for mayor was superseded by her frustration at not being able to make progress from her council seat.

“I realized that I cannot get done what I need to get done for the 4th Ward unless I am mayor,” she said.

She cited the big problem with flooding in her ward. She claimed she was making inroads with the problem before being blocked on some counts by Roberts and the North Hudson Sewerage Authority.

She also had promised not to take money from the political machine during her 2007 4th Ward campaign. But eventually, she took at least $4,000 from members of the HCDO.

Zimmer said that once the campaign dragged into a runoff and beyond, she was put in a situation where she needed funding. “I don’t think it was a breach of trust,” Zimmer said. “I never expected to need that money, and I’m not independently wealthy.”

She said only a “very miniscule amount” was from the HCDO.

She said this time around, she can’t rule out accepting funding from the group, but can’t yet foresee the need.

There is a question about whom the HCDO is supporting this year. Some believe that the group may be supporting Cammarano, but also that the group stealthily pushed for Zimmer to enter the race in order to take votes away from Mason, who appeals to a similar demographic.

Both Zimmer and Cammarano have denied courting or getting HCDO financial help this year. Zimmer also denied any HCDO plot.

But Zimmer has strong connections to the organization since her runningmate, former councilwoman Carol Marsh, was a vice chairman of the organization until she decided to run for council. Also, major Zimmer supporter Michael Lenz received a county job two years ago that some claim was given to him because of his work with the HCDO.

Zimmer said last week that Lenz is just another volunteer, not a person who is shaping her message or making political decisions. Lenz is a very vocal former city CFO who also served on the Hoboken Board of Education with a reform group in the 1990s.

Zimmer said she’s not promising positions to anyone – Lenz included – but rather promising a fair and open process to fill positions if she gets the top job.

Beside the political machine and Lenz, some have wondered whether the person really running the show is Zimmer’s husband, Stan Grossbard. The rumor is that Grossbard is too outspoken, so Zimmer was run for council as a compromise.

Zimmer said she takes offense at the claim, although she said Grossbard is her closest confidant and helping her out on every front.

“It’s not like Stan is telling me what to say,” she said.

Zimmer also has been criticized because her election team gave out lottery tickets with campaign literature during her ward election (as mentioned in a Reporter investigative piece last December). Zimmer claims that correspondence from the Attorney General’s office disputes the illegality of the tickets, but that no matter what, she won’t be handing them out this time around.

And then there’s Cammarano

Cammarano may be enjoying the vicious volleys that have gone on between Zimmer and Mason’s supporters of late, since both candidates have had less time to attack him. Still, Cammarano has been the target of some ads, mailers, and internet comments.

Wednesday, Hoboken voters received a glossy mailer from Mason claiming Cammarano was connected to Mayor Roberts.

While Cammarano did get elected on a slate with Roberts four years ago, he broke with Roberts very publicly two years later. He has voted with the administration’s allies on the council many times, and against a faction including Zimmer, Mason, Russo, Castellano, and Peter Cunningham.

Cammarano said last week that he hasn’t discounted help from the Hudson County Democratic Organization (HCDO), but “it’s not on the table.” He wouldn’t accept their backing, he said, if it came with any strings attached.

Some critics place Cammarano in the pocket of the police and fire employees. But as chairman of the council’s Public Safety Subcommittee, Cammarano came out strongly against the SWAT Team scandal two years ago. He said last week that he would have held the commanding officers – former Chief Carmen LaBruno and Lt. Angelo Andriani – accountable, with minimal discipline handed out to the “rank and file.”

“Discipline should be from the top down,” he said.

But does Cammarano’s top-down theory of responsibility lose steam when applied to the city budget? He voted against a resolution that would have slightly cut Roberts’ salary following the city budget crisis last year.

“It wasn’t meaningful savings,” Cammarano said. He said more effective cuts can be made at the bargaining table and that symbolic cuts weren’t worthwhile.

The opposition is portraying Cammarano as another Roberts, since he ran on the mayor’s ticket in 2005. His voting record, Cammarano said, proves differently. He cites votes against an eminent domain land grab at 11th and Willow streets and the sale of the municipal garage as times when he broke off from Roberts.

Cammarano has been seen as someone who gets a lot of support from outside of the county. Cammarano responded that although he has support from outside Hoboken, he won’t owe any favors when the campaign ends. Most of his non-Hoboken supporters, Cammarano said, are personal friends or allies from past statewide elections he was involved in.

But since they don’t live here and wouldn’t reap any benefits from his getting elected, are they just giving him time and money from the goodness of their hearts?

“Yes,” Cammarano said. “When you’re in the trenches [during an election], you develop these relationships with people.”

His law firm is supportive of political endeavors, Cammarano said, but he will be leaving his position there if elected. He said if that happens, the city will have no interaction with the firm. Some people have questioned why a law firm would support an individual’s personal political endeavor – especially when it wouldn’t bring them any more business – but Cammarano said they just do. Is it a good business model? “I can’t say if it is or it isn’t,” he remarked.

Meanwhile, there’s another issue that the young lawyer has to contend with – vicious internet rumors claiming he ran over a dog.

Cammarano said last week that this is a lie. Shortly after he moved to town, he was the target of a scam, he said. A note left on his car windshield said his vehicle was involved in a canine hit-and-run, but he later found out that the supposed dog-owner told police it was a brunette driving the car. Cammarano said the perpetrator of the scam asked him for a cash pay-out to make it all go away, but instead Cammarano provided a litany of evidence to a judge proving that he was on his college campus during the time when the accident occurred. The case was dismissed, he said.



Timothy J. Carroll may be reached at tcarroll@hudsonreporter.com.

Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
homeinhoboken
|
May 08, 2009
The reporter and 411 covered the fact that Peter Cammarano had a kid in High School and he pays child support. At the same time, the reporter refuses to cover the fact that Vincent Addeo was arrested for beating his wife to a pulp. There are only two possible conclusions here:

1/ The reporter agrees "the bitch deserved it"

2/ The reporter is afraid of Vinnie and his union buddies.
degeorgi
|
May 06, 2009
hobo45: read all the complaints against hoboken411 here:

http://www.hobokenrevolt.com/forum/topics/vote-for-zimmer

If I violated the rules, then Perry himself violated his own rules - watch for his language - he calls us political whores, meanwhile he was bought off by Mason. He banned everyone that was shocked by Mason behavior and attempted to discuss it.
Hobo4545
|
May 06, 2009
wow looks like almost 400 people read this article and more than that read it in print...now we know the truth about zimmer and cammarano.

i think the charge aboutr 411 is overblown. degeorgi maybe you violated the terms of service. if you tell lies the will ban you.
degeorgi
|
May 05, 2009
I was banned from hoboken411 when I argued about Mason's dirty tactics. She surrounded herself with corrupt and morally corrupt people. Why would anyone trust her at this point? She spent a quarter of a million of her own money to win...she wants it so badly...why?

I think she would be bad news for Hoboken if elected, just like Cammarano, the liar.
wrongjake
|
May 03, 2009
hilip Cohen tried to defend beth on the hobokennow site but of course didnt answer the questions people really have. he talks about pasquales record on the hha and does not mention that pasquale appoined troy washington who left a host of problems (try looking at the reporter articles to read all about it).

Also he notes that now beth is running in a citywide election so she needs to bond with machines to win. well thats what she accused zimmer of and now she is doing it, and her machine was founded by people who ended up in jail for stealing form hoboken.

phililp, please answer about that!

here are some more questions for you:

1) how come on 411 you criticized the reporters letters policy of not accepting negative letters the last week before the election, but you seem ok that 411 does not ever accept negative letters about beth, 52 weeks a year? now THAT is censorship.

and how come now 411 is refusing to accept negative letters about any candidate, suddenly its ok when 411 does it.?

2) yes we know beth spent a lot of money suing a bunch of times before she ran for mayor. but that tells us nothing about how she would manage hoboken if she was in the top job, and her behavior in the last few months shows us how she would govern.

by leaving people out

by pandering to ex-cons to win office, doing the wrong thing, not working with perceived competitors, and being anything but transparent. how about some answers to questions?

3. yes you are right phil, she may win. she may be ahead of the polls (russos are good at delivering votes). but is that how beth wants to win?

is that how you want her to win?

please explain these things so i can feel better. i miss the old beth but when tested suddenly she changes. i shudder how being mayor could affect her...
HReformNow
|
May 03, 2009
someone like beth really needs to win the 3rd and 4th wards to win, and she knows that. she can still convince the yups in the other wards to give her some votes, but the 3rd and 4th were weak. so she needs the russos to get out the vote on election day and they will.

so yes what pierc said is true.

i wonder if she will accept hte russos paying hoards of election workers $50 on election day? will she let them use their usual tactics to win? like said below she says shes transparent, so lets all ask her.

anyone want to answer?

the russos will help her into a runoff with peter and then we will have to be faced with a compromised beth or a compromised peter, how nice
PierC
|
May 03, 2009
I agree with you. There is such hypocrisy in her answer to the question of people serving their time and moving forward and accepting the support of the Russo machine.

The old Beth would not have taken support and direction from the Russos (I thought). The new Beth seems to have compromised her core principles in an attempt to gain the mayor's seat.
TruthInBoken
|
May 03, 2009
Beth says very clearly in this story: "When people serve their time and are moving forward, we should support that."

So she has no problem working with and courting the endoresement of Hoboken's biggest political machine, that has had three of its former partners go to jail for corruption in Hoboken, but she objected last year to Dawn Zimmer taking support from the county Democratic organization to fight off Chris Campos.

Plus, not all the Russo have served their time. As Kurta pointed out above, Michele was implicated by someone during an investigation and never had to be tried.

I would like Beth or one of her supporters to clear up the apparent hypocrisy. For someone who claims to be independent, she refuses to talk to anyone or answer questions like this no matter how many times they are asked (the reporter story is an exception becasue she'd have looked worse if she didn't answer but now there is a very important followup: Why are you not a liar and a hypocrit for criticizing someone and then doing something much worse?)

Her supporters read blogs and she knows what is said of her. As a voter I ask Beth publicly: PLease explain. Explain to me and anyone else who has this question. The response from suporters is always 'well dawns friend is mike lenz who works for the county,' but lenz hasn't done anything illegal and meanwhile this doesnt excuse how you criticize dawn for having accepted democratic help but then allow beth to be beholde3n to a WORSE and more nefarious machine.

PLease answer the question!