The Mason candidacy in Hoboken: What went wrong?
May 13, 2009 | 1905 views | 15 15 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Popular 2nd Ward Councilwoman Beth Mason made headlines for the last few years as a citizen who sued Hoboken City Hall several times, fighting with her own money to make government records open and transparent. Then, after she ascended to her council seat two years ago, she seemed destined for the mayor's race.

For the last two years, she consistently voted in line with two other council people also seen as reformers -- Dawn Zimmer and Peter Cunningham -- as well as to members of a long-time political family in town, councilpeople Michael Russo and Theresa Castellano. All five of them often formed a voter bloc against Mayor David Roberts' policies.

However, Zimmer and Mason's supporters, who theoretically should have been allies, started to split last year, unwililng to share the power or the "reformer" base.

Last year, Mason refused to support the "reform" school board ticket that Zimmer supported, instead endorsing one member of the slate and one independent. Ultimately, the ticket lost, something the Zimmer crew blamed Mason's allies for. Several very vocal backers on both sides simply couldn't get along, firing vicious barbs at each other on internet websites.

Ultimately, Zimmer decided at the end of last year to jump into the Hoboken mayor's race as well.

Mason allied herself with Russo and Castellano, which she saw as a way to build a bridge between old and new Hoboken -- and increase her base in different parts of town. But that appeared to alienate some of Mason's supporters, who did not seem to like either the alliance or Mason's council ticket choices. Mason had criticized Zimmer for taking help from the county Democratic organization the year before, but now she herself was getting help from a powerful political organization (the Russo Civic Association). Some wondered if that would make her beholden to them.

Then, there were Mason's recent votes that were questioned by individual members of a new taxpayers' group, Hoboken Revolt.

Prominent members of that group called out Mason for voting to extend an abatement agreement for the moderate income Church Towers building, which Revolt thought needed more research first. In addition, Mason supported a redevelopment project uptown that some other council members felt needed more vetting. And last month, Mason declined to endorse the "Kids First" school board slate, which was popular with many reformers. Mason's silence made some wonder if she was unwilling to ruffle the feathers of her newer allies across town.

The election became nastier and nastier, with Zimmer and Mason's supporters warring against each other more than against Cammarano, who merely had to smile on the sidelines and keep blaming both women for voting against Roberts' budget last year, which he said indirectly caused a state takeover of city finances.

On PolitickerNJ today, they had this to say about Mason's candidacy: "Repeatedly castigated by both the Cammarano and Zimmer camps for abandoning her reformer roots to assemble a slate of old school Hobokonites, Mason argued that she didn’t have to agree with her running mates on every issue in order to feel comfortable running with them.

"But her efforts to forge her 2nd Ward supporters with the remnants of the [former Mayor] Anthony Russo era proved politically hazardous.

"A win by Mason would have substantially augmented the power of 3rd Ward Councilman Michael Russo – the former mayor’s son -who stayed out of his own run for mayor when his poll numbers didn’t add up and instead backed the councilwoman. While Russo weathers the loss with Mason tonight, the apparent runoff viability of both Raul Morales and Vincent Addeo means the councilman can still claim some measure of competitiveness.

"That won’t help Mason, whose vote in favor of the Church Towers extension, a move that directly benefited Russo and Addeo, who both live in the building, cemented her new look image – in the harshest terms of her critics - as a Russo enabler.

" 'She threw away her base,' concluded Paul Swibinski, Cammarano’s strategist."

Comment below!!!

Comments
(15)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
NewspaperFan
|
May 14, 2009
Sandwich, you didn't really get to the main issue. Yes, Cammarano was hurt on 411, but not by Zimmer, it was by Mason, who is out of the race.

I still want to know exactly why the artists are supporting Camamrano over her. If he really is moer involved with the arts, then that is a good reason, but it seems like your reasoning is lacking.

Also, the guy who was handing out the information, your saying does not live in Hoboken, tehrefore will not be affected by the next mayor's choices. In that case, sounds like Holly/Helly/whatever her name was rightly exposed him as a fraud and a patsy who was being used and didn't know anything about the candidate he was campaigning for.

Doesn't that make you all look dumb and flaky?
HobokenSandwich.com
|
May 14, 2009
Oh yeah.. Maurice Davis Band at Maxwells on May 22.

Hoping to get both Zimmer and Cammarano out for the show. Maybe get 'em a vip section setup and interview them both about their favorite Hoboken sandwiches. Perhaps debate format in 3 parts:

Bread

Deli

Mutz

Of all the questions nobody is asking Cammarano, we feel these are paramount.
HobokenSandwich.com
|
May 14, 2009
-Newspaperfan-

The Hoboken resident/musician that was maligned by Halley Wolowiec on Hoboken411 performs in my favorite local band. Local artists "The Maurice Davis Band". His name is Keith and he plays lead guitar and works construction during the day. He became involved not through Cammaranos' campaign, but via a friend who introduced him to a group of "Artists for Cammarano". Why these artists are not falling in line with what appears to be some sort of artists mafia that demands compliance is beyond HobokenSandwich.

Why is HobokenSandwich endorsing Cammarano?

Each candidate has some baggage. Each is a decent person who seems to want to make Hoboken a better place. Different positives for each. Different negatives for each. Our endorsement was split until the attacks on Cammarano became excessive and detrimental to the actual issues at hand. At that point, because Google likes us and we have a big mouth, and we simply want to hurt those who deserve it, we decided to fight that crap.

Furthermore if Dawn Zimmer wins, HobokenSandwich will be congratulating her with a "Big Paulie" from Luca Brasis. This is her favorite sandwich. You can see the sandwich interview at http://dawnzimmerhoboken.com

Win or lose, we'll feel pretty good.

Hobo87
|
May 13, 2009
Mason's campaign had nothing to do with 'reform'. If she'd stuck to reform, though I would have respected her more, then it's possible Cammarano would actually have won outright. Now it's back to one reformer, a more or less genuine one though not perfect of course, v one status quo, and a reasonable shot for reform.

The main harm done in the meantime is not bad blood, if you want a friend in politics get a dog, and Beth Mason will endorse Dawn Zimmer if she sees it as in Beth Mason's interest, period. The main harm done is Mason's money putting Addeo in position to possibly replace Terry LaBruno as the City workers' unions' rep on the council. The unions can represent themselves fine from their own side of the table in a negotiation, that's fair enough. The council should represent the taxpayers.
GaryGar
|
May 13, 2009
I am sure she will recah out. In fact I bet she did so last year when she wanted Mason's support against Campos in the runoff, and Mason refused to help. See where that got us?
Andynboken
|
May 13, 2009
I had mentioned many times in March that Cammarano would skate right through the "reformer" infighting and I'm surprised at how well he did because of it. I hope Dawn will reach out to those Mason supporters and try to bring them into the fold or we're all stuck w/ Cammarano. I for one do not want someone who thinks just because they voted for a budget means it was the right thing to do. Sweeping the mess under the rug would have continued the status quo which is not what we need anymore.
GaryGar
|
May 13, 2009
Yes Hobo87 I agree...I saw that many people were disillusioned by Mason's changing positions but she still had a lot of money and an army of workers and allies so I was surprised at what happened.

Pleasantly, I might add.

Cammarano still got first place though, so money and connections still matter. I will be curious to see who blames who for what.
Hobo87
|
May 13, 2009
It was easy to theorize as the campaign went on that Mason might lose the way she did: taxpaying Hoboken pissed off by her changes in position and association with hardcore status quo politicans, plus the slimy tactics and arrogant attitudes of her people on the internet and in general; and then that many in subsidized Hoboken would go with the proven real deal status quo candidate Cammarano, not Beth-come-lately status quo wannabe.

But, it wasn't easy to see that would actually happen. Mason had a lot more money to adverstise and was controlling the number one political website in town, with not that much independent media covering the campaign in detail otherwise (with all due respect, Reporter). And she had earned a reputation as 'reformer' that had some validity, before this campaign at least. Rather than a strong backlash, it just could have been just Mason drowning out all criticism and succeeding in keeping her previous base while crossing over to the status quo.

Lots of Mason people including some who comment here frequently insisted the taxpayer backlash against Mason was a tempest in a internet teapot almost nobody was listening to; apparently they were wrong. But I don't claim I was sure they were wrong. I was pleasantly suprised to find out how wrong they were.
NewspaperFan
|
May 13, 2009
Sandwich, I just went and read the story. I think you have been fooled.

who is this guy who was handing out those cards, and how do you know he WASNT paid by cammarano? if he doesnt live in hoboken then he's just being used.

And why would artists all band together for Camamrano? I'm not picking on you, but it is a legit question.
NewspaperFan
|
May 13, 2009
very interesting, sandwich. i didn't even read that story before.

why did your friends vote for cammarano and not zimmer? and why are they coming out in support of cammarano? he really hasn't done much for the arts that i can see. zimmer is a photographer.
HobokenSandwich.com
|
May 13, 2009
I can account for at least 20 votes that Mason lost based upon this Hoboken411 story alone.

http://www.topix.com/city/hoboken-nj/2009/05/halley-wolowiec-hates-beatniks-yet-speaks-for-hoboken-artists-nah

These votes were lost out of pure disgust for 411s' lopsided and seemingly calculated coverage of Beth Mason vs. everyone, particularly Cammarano who had no love from my friends 2 weeks ago. Now he can count all their votes from yesterday.

Thats right, we all came out and voted to spite 411 and his posting minions. And it worked.

Sure the Mason campaign could have done a better job of walking the walk of reform instead of bowing at the alter of Church Towers.

But ultimately she lost our particular votes by association to 411.

PS: a bunch of local musicians are out tonight in support of Cammarano. The Shannon at 106 First St. 8PM
NewspaperFan
|
May 13, 2009
seemed to me that many people on many blogs have been complaining about some of the mason changes over the last year, and were shouted down quickly by mason's few angry posters. if they had instead responded to the concerns or talked to beth abuot them, or beth herself had responded, the outcome could have been different. i think that mike and tony probably rubbed them the wrnog way at some point (they certainly can do that) and after that it was too hard to get them back. but this should not have become personal. just one person's opinion.
ReformerusG
|
May 13, 2009
Minor Correction to the story. If memory serves me correct Beth endorsed two independents Maureen Sullivan and Ron Rosenberg in the 2008 BOE race. She did endorse Tricia Snyder on Kids First ticket as well but declined to endorse the other two memebers of that slate.
CadsRightHob
|
May 13, 2009
Someone on Kurt's site said that Beth was a good person and would have been the best person to lead Hoboken if she hadn't taken advice from the Russos and certain other bad apples. I contend that a strong leader would not have done so, and that this is a very good measure of how someone WOULD lead.

It's not that she was misled by a few people, she -let-herself be misled. This shows that she was not ready to lead.

She also made confusing decisions (as the story said above) last year with the school board and with refusing to help dawn, as peter cunningham pointed out.

I do like Beth and think she is smart and brave but she threw that out, so lets see if she can get back on track. Ther eis s till a chance in my opinion, no?
CDeVille
|
May 13, 2009
I think Mr. Swabinski has it right in that last sentence.