Election schedules and unintended consequences
Feb 11, 2018 | 1654 views | 2 2 comments | 70 70 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Dear Editor:

There are problems with December runoffs, but, despite what the blogs say, increasing voter fraud isn’t one of them. 1,000 bought and paid for votes don’t matter less in November when you need 4,000 votes to win, than they do in December, when you need 7,000 to win. Nonetheless, I don’t like runoff elections in December, which is always too busy. It’s hard on voters and even harder on the people who volunteer on campaigns. And fewer volunteers from Hoboken just increases the impact of money and support from outside Hoboken.

But switching from May to November elections the way we did had a disastrous unintended consequence. Eliminating the runoff entirely strongly incentivized toxic campaigns. Much like the broken Electoral College system nationally, Hoboken’s broken electoral system now rewards targeting a divisive message at a narrow support base of 30-35 percent. With a runoff, this strategy is a losing one, as no supporter of an eliminated candidate would turn to the campaign who’d falsely smeared their first choice. The need to win a majority of the popular vote keeps campaigns focused on serving most, and ideally all, of the electorate. Electing a president with less than half the vote is ripping our country apart. Electing a mayor with less than a third of the vote threatens to do the same to our city.

I wish we could go back to the May election and June runoff. But the state legislature in its infinite wisdom has made that impossible until we’ve suffered for ten years under this terrible system that we chose. So what do we do until then? Just live with what we’ve got? After what we lived through last November almost anything would be better – even a December runoff. We can’t go back to where we were. The consequences of staying where we are played out vividly in the damage they did to Hoboken’s political civility. We have no choice but to move forward.

If it were our only option I would still consider a runoff in December a bad choice but I would probably conclude it the best bad choice available. But it’s not the only option. We have another choice – Instant Runoff – that would show the kind of leadership Hoboken should strive to be known for. Hoboken’s city council has all stated their support for the idea. Some would wait on the legislature. But after years of inaction in Trenton that seems an unlikely hope. This council has voted to give the voters the chance to restore majority rule. Great. Now they should show leadership and schedule a referendum letting Hoboken voters demand Instant Runoff.

Hoboken is famous for having the first girl play little league, the first woman elected mayor in Hudson County and the first Sikh mayor to be elected in the state of New Jersey. We can do this too.

We might not be successful right away. It might take years. But let us begin.

Michael Lenz

Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
anonymous
|
February 13, 2018
Mike can you expand on "what we lived through last November" that was so awful?
Tottenhamwins
|
February 12, 2018
What Mike likes to conveniently ignore is the turnout in a December runoff will likely be so low that the winner will need even less votes in December to win a runoff than they will need in November to qualify for the runoff. If he really wanted majority rule, he'd keep the race in November when turnout is higher.

The dirty little secret they all want you to ignore is people don't show up for elections in vast numbers except when you have big state or federal races being voted on at the same time. And because turnout will be lower, those 1000 bought votes will have an even greater negative impact. So what he really wants is MINORITY rule and let the bought and paid for votes swing the election.

As for "smear campaigns", calling Jen out on being a Republican is not a smear. At the time, it was the truth. Deal with it.