Is Zimmer administration following its own promises of transparency?
Nov 17, 2009 | 1257 views | 12 12 comments | 18 18 recommendations | email to a friend | print

HOBOKEN--The Hoboken City Council considered choosing a 4th Ward councilperson at their meeting Monday night, to fill the seat left open when Dawn Zimmer ascended to mayor.

Several Zimmer allies, including Michael Lenz and Tony Soares, have expressed their interest in the position. Lenz is a former school board president who later managed former Mayor David Roberts' campaign, became city CFO when Roberts was elected, and then was fired by the Roberts administration. Lenz contended that the firing was unfair and political and won a six-figure settlement. He now works for the county.

Soares is the former 4th Ward councilman and like Lenz is a big Zimmer ally.

At Monday night's meeting, Councilwoman Theresa Castellano complained that some of the council members were pushing for the council to choose a 4th Ward councilperson tonight, even though Castellano has not seen resumes of candidates.

Whoever was chosen would lead the council until a special election can be held in November.

Castellano noted that Zimmer's allies had promised to make City Hall more transparent, and to interview candidates for positions rather than just hiring allies.

But Lenz, when he got up to the microphone, accused critics of trying to hamper the process, saying the same critics were, in the past, "silent when things were done in back rooms and whatever else."

Lenz argued that putting off the vote would mean those people would "try and deprive the 4th Ward" of leadership for another two weeks.

He also spoke about what the ward needs: More youth programs, more progress on the flooding issue. He also said he could help with the city's major budget problems.

He said he had phoned every council person to express his interest in the position. He also said that anyone who was interested in the position should have contacted the council.

But 4th Ward resident Rachel Goldberg spoke next, saying the 4th Ward DOES need good representation, and that it's not a decision that should be taken lightly. She read from the councilpeople's own campaign literature, noting that several of them had promised to make the city more transparent and accessible.

She said that being more transparent about the vote would show that the city is changing the way things are done.

She also noted that she is not running for the office.

Soares spoke later, talking about his work as former 4th Ward councilman, including fighting to bring the light rail to the city's west side.

Stay tuned to this site for more information later.

Comments
(12)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
back2uHob
|
November 17, 2009
I am pleased to see such a good healthy discussion in our town. I do think it is only fair to hold everyones feet to the fire regarding transparency, regarding whetghr you like mike or not. He has been at the center of good and tough times in hoboken over the years. smarty i enjoyed your play by play, keep up the good work!
DancingRudy
|
November 17, 2009
As long as we're on the topic of transparency - does anybody think that the "stategy" of having Mason abstain materialized transparently? Or did Mason, Giacci, Russo and Castellano hold "secret" meetings or conversations where they devised their scheme?

Giacci is actually caught on tape in a conversation with Steve Kleinman that makes it clear that Mr. Kleinman was complicit in the scheme. The unsavory motives of Mason, Giacci, Russo and Castellano.

Perhaps at the next meeting each City Council member should be asked to write an essay entitled "What does transparency mean as applied to me."

Smarty Jones
|
November 17, 2009
We did a live blog of events last night. The story here does balance with fair criticism/comment on all sides. The bottom line is transparency is not defined. But everyone knew the situation after the election and the appointment would be made. There is no guiding precedent for appointments like this in Hoboken. There was ONLY back room deals.

The obstructionists are doing an Alinsky. Holding up Dawn Zimmer and her coalition to their own undefined standard of transparency. As has been noted, the name of the final choice was already completed before even a council meeting previously. Nino Giacchi sits there as a recipient of such back room deals and how he came into being. Irony.

Could this be improved with a public meeting before the CC meeting? Sure. Would it have made a difference. Not likely.

The 4th has representation now for a year. Let's move on. The hospital executives came to visit and made it clear. They will pillage and plunder Hoboken as long as possible. That's the BIG STORY here. Will they be stopped? They have Hoboken right where they want it, in a straitjacket. And they are sucking the blood out of the patient as we speak.

More coverage, live blog analysis, photos and video:

Mile Square View

http://hobokenhorse.blogspot.com
WESTY
|
November 17, 2009
Anyone who has been paying the slightest attention should have know what was going on and the process.

One must always remember that Mrs. Castellano would never be on the City Council if she was not related to digraced former mayor Anthony Russo, father of Michael Russo, who was convicted of corruption charges, fined and jailed.

So now Terri just snipes from the sidelines adding nothing and deperate to protect the shrinking turf of her once poweful political family.

FrankLeeMyDeer
|
November 17, 2009
"The council position is a political position, the"

Exactly. SO why preternd it's anything else? It's not tranmsparent or fair, it's political. The Zimmer supporters should not try to pretend they're any better then what came before, if that is the case.
HALLERON
|
November 17, 2009
Considering the way we burn through politicians in Hoboken, this process should be streamlined by now. A replaces B, so A is replaced by C. Even I knew who was in the running for the open 4th Ward position and I don't even live there (I live in the 6th, for what it's worth). If our "leadership" can't bother to pick up the local paper and know what's going on in their own City Council, then they shouldn't be there in the first place.
raiser
|
November 17, 2009
Mike Lenz was a good choice. I disagree with criticism of the process. The council position is a political position, the question is would be true to the intentions of the Fourth ward, when they picked Dawn. That was always going to be a Dawn supporter. In the absence of another election Dawn was best suited to pick. So it was above and beyond to have multiple candidates (all of whom I assume were acceptable to Dawn)

In the future, for anything less, I think they should have some sort of seperate meeting, maybe one of the subcommittees where everyone and their supporters can speak. Make it open to the public. They could then make the voting faster in the regular meeting, start with the informal vote for who gets put up for selection first.
anonymous
|
November 17, 2009
DancingRudy, let me correct myself. SEVERAL of the appointments or council votes were for allies of Zimmer or people she already knew. I apologize for saying all the appointments were people who worked on her campaign.

That said what is your explanation for last night? That Roberts did it so it was OK? I thought the idea was to do better then them, not the same.

SHame on anyone who thought the process needed to be rushed through last night.

There were otehrs complaining not just the russos. Who is rachel goldberg? is she a russo person or maybe just a citizen who wanted a fair process?
DancingRudy
|
November 17, 2009
Even on a blog, some standard of truthtelling should be applied. Annonymous says that Dawn has appointed only people who worked on her campaign. In fact, non of the 3 directors she appointed worked on her campaign. One - Leo Pellegrino - actually actively supported her opponents. Another Brandy Forbes, is not from Hoboken. The third, Ian Sacs, was a member of Peter Cammarano's transition team.

Nothing is more important to "transparency" than truth. There is something surreal about someone using the screen name "annonymous" on a blog to provide a lecture to others about transparency

DancingRudy
|
November 17, 2009
In 2001, Nino Giacci was selected by the City Council to fill the seat vacated by David Roberts upon his election as Mayor. There was no public process whatsoever. Dave Roberts picked him, his name was put into nomination, nobody else was permitted to "apply," and the City Council, including Councilwoman Theresa Castellano voted him in.

Given the manner in which he first obtained his position as 6th ward Councilman, the hypocrisy in Mr. Giacci complaints last night about a "process" far more transparent than has ever been followed by the Hoboken City Council in filling a vacancy in an elected position, is mind boggling.

anonymous
|
November 17, 2009
agree that mason has become a joke.

disagree that last night was transparent.

your contention that the council minority 'should have' known a vote was coming is ridiculous. the notion of transparency is that the council and city government should make it clear that a position is open AND THAT THEY ARE SEEKING PEOPLE FOR IT.

not kind of just let it hang out there and the politically connected people will know it exists.

so far dawn has appointed or pursued only people who have worked on her campaign.

JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE BETTER THEN THE PAST DOES NOT MEAN THEY ARE AS GOOD OR OPEN AS THEY CAN BE!!!

The reporter reporter on this site yesterday that lezn would be the choice, before any open discussion in public. how did they know?: how did everyone know?

was there a deal made or not?

these are all worthwhile questions to ask, i dont know the answer, do you know hoboken reformer?
HobokenReformer
|
November 17, 2009
It was a great pleasure to see last night that the council shenanigans of yesteryear have finally come to an end. Contrary to the BS that Castellano, Russo and Mason promulgated, this was the most open, transparent and fair process for appointing a council replacement this city has ever seen. The notion that the obstructionist faction of the council (Mason, Russo, Castellano, Giacchi) did not know that there was a vote coming up in the next council meeting, that they did not know the candidates, that the candidates did not know how to apply etc. is just utterly preposterous.

The fact is that anybody who is even remotely involved in what is going on in Hoboken politics had known the names of the candidates for at least a week or two since there were articles listing their names on several local news sites and blogs. Also, at least Lenz, Soares and Stuiver are individuals with extensive histories of public service in Hoboken. So if Mason and Castellano need their resumes to judge their candidacy, then it is clear to me that Castellano and Mason are the ones who are misplaced because they are ill-informed and thus unfit to represent their constituents. What a joke Mason has become over the course of this past year!