Is there a quiet plan to move Hoboken municipal garage to Jackson and Sixth streets?
May 18, 2010 | 2099 views | 3 3 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print

HOBOKEN -- Now that a developer will soon be building on the site of Hoboken's municipal garage on Observer Highway, the city must find a place to build a new garage for its vehicles. The current garage site, located in a pricey area not far from the train station, was sold under the administration of Mayor David Roberts in order to get millions of dollars for the city budget.

Residents of the area near Jackson and Sixth streets are concerned that the city is quietly planning to move the facility to the open plot of land on Jackson and Monroe between Sixth and Seventh streets.

A note e-mailed to neighbors says: "This Wednesday's (May 19, 7pm - 10pm located at 94 Washington St) City Council agenda includes a public hearing and final vote on the relocation of a municipal waste garage to the open plot of land on Jackson and Monroe between 6th and 7th streets."

In order for there to be a hearing and final vote, the council would have had to have already voted to introduce the ordinance IN PUBLIC at a previous meeting. So is it true that they are planning to move there, and that there's a final vote tomorrow night?

New city spokesman Juan Melli responded, "The Mayor is proposing a Bond Ordinance for $1,980,000 for the environmental review of potential sites and the building of a public works garage to replace the existing location on Observer Highway. Numerous sites have been proposed, and we are investigating locations in the City. The City is under no contract to acquire properties at this point. Putting this process in place will allow the City to move quickly to acquire property if a location is determined."

Okay, but is this property at the top of the list? A followup question was asked. In the meantime, if you are concerned about that neighborhood, show up at tomorrow's meeting, which will also be broadcast live here at www.hudsonreporter.com.

UPDATE: Melli responds: "No, the city is not voting on a specific property. I'll have more info for you very shortly." Stay tuned!

Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
kumahadaka
|
May 27, 2010
For any resident that wants to find out the facts show up to the next council meeting on June 2nd where they are supposed to be voting on the 2 million dollar bond for the proposed temporary relocation of the municipal garage. The city instead of spending the time to find a permanent location would rather waste 2 million on a temporary location. The main location of focus is on Jackson across from the Juliana in the middle of residential area. The garage should be relocated to an industrial area away from any residential. The bottom line is this location will waste 2 million dollars and also prevent the city from collecting the tax dollars from the 100 plus condo units that could be placed on this site.
4thWardWatchingU
|
May 20, 2010
hey bloggers take note and read this story: the reporter actually asked followup questions. why don't you?
4thWardWatchingU
|
May 20, 2010
Thanks to the Reporter for being one of only TWO responsible news outlets to actually ask questions about this story instead of stupidly assuming that either the city's releases are 100 percent correct OR that 411 is 100 per cent correct. The city is avoiding certain questions and 411 posted some wrong information. In the middle are us, the 4th ward residents, who have some information that shows that we need to be concerned.

You were the first to post taht the city would NOT be voting on the specific location this week, but also to ask questions about whether the city is truly moving toward choosing this property. Which is what a RESPONSIBLE newspaper should do - ask questions and print FACTS. If some of the other outlets were not so biased toward the city or against it, they might get some real answers for the public. The city govt is are supposed to be honest but this is one thing they are dancing around. Is Pino the top choice or not? If it is than say so.

Please keep up the investigation you do and keep pushing them since there is almost no one left in town who is neutral enough to do it. Certainly not the pro-Mason OR pro-Zimmer bloggers all of whom try to pretend they dont have an agenda, thats diddly.

This is our neighborhood. We dont care about the politics of this, we want to read the TRUTH.